(J-K) - 0.25*(G-K); which should be < 0.03, along with absK<0.
The query is here:
SELECT top 1500000 g.source_id,g.ra,g.dec,g.l,g.b,g.parallax,g.parallax_error,g.pmra,g.pmra_error,g.pmdec,
g.pmdec_error,g.astrometric_n_good_obs_al,g.astrometric_excess_noise,g.astrometric_chi2_al
,g.phot_g_mean_mag,g.phot_bp_mean_mag,g.phot_rp_mean_mag,g.phot_variable_flag,g.teff_val,g.a_g_val,
tm.j_m,tm.j_msigcom,tm.h_m,tm.h_msigcom,tm.ks_m,tm.ks_msigcom,g.phot_g_mean_mag - tm.h_m AS g_min_h,
sqrt(g.phot_g_n_obs)/g.phot_g_mean_flux_over_error as variability,
sqrt( g.astrometric_chi2_al / ( g.astrometric_n_good_obs_al - 5)) as astrometric_quality
FROM gaiadr2.gaia_source AS g
INNER JOIN gaiadr1.tmass_best_neighbour AS xmatch
ON g.source_id = xmatch.source_id
INNER JOIN gaiadr1.tmass_original_valid AS tm
ON tm.tmass_oid = xmatch.tmass_oid
WHERE b between -15 and 15
and
( (tm.j_m - tm.ks_m - 0.25*(g.phot_g_mean_mag - tm.ks_m) < 0.03) or (g.phot_g_mean_mag - tm.ks_m < 1.5) )
and
g.phot_g_mean_mag < 18.
and
g.parallax+g.parallax_error < power(10.,(10.-tm.ks_m)/5.)
and
tm.ks_m < 12.
the basic sample file is here:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ayryeaqfo5jrz8l/massive_star_selection_2MASS.fits?dl=0
and the color-selection is presented below
the (observed) color vs. absmag distribution
shows that we are still missing nearby blue objects (when compared to the literature); this must be a query problem:
I cleaned via: good_astrometry (eliminates many), non-variable (at <0.02) and parallax SNR > 2
Some plots:
Let's look at the distribution in (observed) color vs distance?
compared to the literature (in blue)
What are the reddened stars in the bulge region?
B.t.w. there are some funny variables:
that only occur in the bar/bulge?
this smells like a data artifact; some other time...
and another footnote:
there's an artifact for stars at G=11mag
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen